So an action that happened in just one second in real time could be extended to 15 seconds. And to capture "Quicksilver time" in "Days of Future Past" and "Apocalypse," the "X-Men" team used a Phantom camera capable of both filming 3,000 frames per second and moving at 90 miles per hour. Narrator: The camera was actually running at 96 frames per second. So, for example, this moment in 1999's "The Matrix". If you increase the frame rate, more images are produced, allowing filmmakers to stretch out and slow the scene down frame by frame. Most modern movies are shot at 24 frames per second. The movement trick is still used today, but modern cameras also allow filmmakers to slow down the visuals by changing the frame rates. So he found that the best way to cover up these unavoidable errors was to keep moving the camera, so viewers didn't even have time to notice. Narrator: Without CG, it was difficult for director Douglas Hayes to hide subtle motions like breathing and shaking. Just look at this time-freeze scene in "The Twilight Zone." On set, these actors and objects were stabilized with wires and poles, but these ingredients and this spilling soup were all added with CG.įrozen-in-time sequences have come a long way thanks to advancements in technology and CGI. Narrator: In "X-Men: Days of Future Past," Evan Peters was filmed running on a treadmill in front of a green screen so he could then be placed into these frozen shots, which were filmed at over 3,000 frames per second. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |